In this practice area
Disputes over whether a liability insurer must fund the defence of a claim, how much it must pay, and how costs are allocated between covered and uncovered matters.
What these disputes are about
For many insureds the most valuable part of a liability policy is not the indemnity for damages at the end of a case but the payment of legal costs along the way. Defence costs can exceed the amount eventually paid to the claimant. When an insurer refuses to fund a defence, funds it only in part, or insists on its own choice of lawyers, the insured bears the cost and the risk while the coverage argument is unresolved.
These disputes arise under professional indemnity, directors and officers, management liability, public liability and statutory liability policies. Common triggers are a declinature based on an exclusion, a reservation of rights, and disputes about consent and allocation.
The legal framework
The starting point is the policy. Some policies give the insurer the right and duty to defend. Others provide that the insurer will pay defence costs incurred with its written consent, not to be unreasonably withheld. Many directors and officers policies contain an advancement clause, requiring the insurer to pay costs as they are incurred until it establishes that an exclusion applies, often with a right to repayment if cover is later found not to exist.
Where a claim includes covered and uncovered allegations, or covered and uncovered defendants, the policy may contain an allocation clause. Absent a clause, the question is one of construction, and the courts have looked at whether costs were reasonably incurred in defending the covered claim. The insurer's duty of utmost good faith under section 13 of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) applies to how it handles the claim, including the time it takes to decide and pay. Section 57 entitles the insured to interest on a claim that has been unreasonably withheld.
How these matters run
Time pressure is usually acute because the underlying proceedings do not wait. Defences must be filed and evidence prepared while the coverage position is still being argued. Early steps include confirming notification, requesting consent to the insured's chosen solicitors and counsel, providing costs estimates, and responding in writing to each ground in a reservation of rights so that the record is clear.
If the insurer will not move, the insured may seek urgent declaratory relief that the insurer is obliged to advance costs, which the courts can hear on an expedited basis. Where the claim has already been defended at the insured's expense, the dispute becomes a claim for reimbursement with interest.
How GopherWood Lawyers acts
We review the policy wording, the claim documents and the insurer's correspondence together, and advise quickly on whether the insurer's position on costs is open to it. We prepare notification and consent requests so they meet the policy's conditions, negotiate allocation where a claim is only partly covered, and where needed commence proceedings for declarations and reimbursement.

